Articles

In my book Does Grace Have a Ceiling? The Anatomy of the Will, I argue that the architecture of the human will is not an

In the Book of Genesis, chapter 4, verse 22, we read: wəṣillâ gam-hîʾ yāləḏâ ʾeṯ-tûbal qayin lōṭēš kol-ḥōrēš nəḥōšeṯ ûbarzel. This translates as “And Zillah, she also bore Tubal-Cain, the forger of every instrument of bronze and iron.”

1. Colossians 1:19-20 — ὅτι ἐν αὐτῷ εὐδόκησεν πᾶν τὸ πλήρωμα κατοικῆσαι καὶ δι’ αὐτοῦ ἀποκαταλλάξαι τὰ πάντα εἰς αὐτόν (hoti en autō eudokēsen pan to plērōma katoikēsai kai di’ autou apokatallaxai ta panta eis auton) — through him to reconcile all things to himself, whether on earth or in heaven.

1. Ephesians 1:4 — καθὼς ἐξελέξατο ἡμᾶς (kathōs exelexato hēmas) — “just as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world.”
2. Ephesians 1:5 — προορίσας ἡμᾶς (proorisas hēmas) — “having predestined us for adoption.”

Image and Imagination-Essays and Reviews presents a rigorous doctrinal inquiry into the nature of literary imagination, the ontological status of images, and their function within both pagan and Christian poetics. Lewis distinguishes sharply between the mere visual image and the deeper imaginative act that participates in the creation of meaning.

On April 12, 2026, President Donald Trump posted an AI-generated image depicting himself in flowing white robes with divine light emanating from his hands as he healed a sick person. The background featured American symbols including flags, eagles, fighter jets, and the Statue of Liberty. The post was deleted the following day amid widespread backlash, even from some of his Christian supporters, who labeled it “gross blasphemy.” The creator later claimed it portrayed him merely as a doctor helping people, yet the imagery unmistakably evoked traditional Christian depictions of Jesus Christ as healer and savior.

We believe that God, in His sovereign will, has already saved every human being through the finished work of Jesus Christ.

Today we examine the convergence of biblical eschatology and contemporary geopolitics through a rigorous hermeneutical and empirical lens.

The primary fallacies of dispensationalism come into sharp focus when examined through the Hebrew and Greek New Testament. Dispensationalism rests on three main pillars: segmented dispensations tied to οἰκονομία (oikonomia – from οἶκος “house” + νόμος “law,” literally “house-law” or “administration”; from Proto-Indo-European *weyḱ- “clan, household” and *nem- “to assign, allot”), the term αἰών (aiōn – “age, era, long but finite period”; from Proto-Indo-European *h₂eyu- “vital force, life, eternity,” the same root that gives us Latin aevum and English “ever”), a rigid Israel-church distinction, and a hyper-literal approach to prophecy that prioritizes future compartments over fulfillment in Christ. All three pillars collapse under careful lexical and contextual analysis of the original texts.