Articles

The primary fallacies of dispensationalism in light of the Hebrew and Greek New Testament.

Shadow and Redeemer in Lilith sit at the heart of MacDonald’s theology. Lilith is not merely evil; she is the primal rebel whose refusal to submit mirrors the human soul’s pride. Yet MacDonald redeems her. In Chapter 29 she finally drinks the water of life and is restored, becoming the vehicle through which Adam’s first wife is brought back into the family of God. The Shadow that pursues Vane is the dark double of self-will, but it too is ultimately dissolved in the same waters. Redemption is universal because the numinous pull of divine beauty finally overcomes every shadow.

Doctoral-level presentation: Fatal exegetical and theological flaws in Ellen G. White’s core doctrines when examined against the Hebrew and Greek texts of Scripture.

The narrative arc of Christ’s incarnation, passion, and triumph emerges not merely as a singular historical event but as a profound convergence of ancient archetypes, refracted through cosmic, mythic, and symbolic lenses—yet it stands apart in its linear trajectory, from Alpha to Omega, against the endless loops of cyclical myth.

In the framework of analytical psychology, Carl Gustav Jung conceptualized the shadow as the repressed, unconscious aspects of the personality—encompassing instinctual drives, moral failings, and unacknowledged aggression that must be confronted and integrated to achieve individuation which is the process toward psychic wholeness. The crucifixion, in Jungian exegesis, functions symbolically as a voluntary ego-dissolution, i.e, a confrontation with the collective shadow, culminating in the Self’s emergence through mythic rebirth.

Consider the recent YouTube Jungian analysis, “Jesus was the first man to achieve individuation” -ca. 18 min long- , which posited Jesus Christ as the inaugural figure to achieve full individuation. The presenter frames baptism as ego-dissolution, Gethsemane as shadow-confrontation, crucifixion as voluntary psychic death, resurrection as Self-realization. It’s elegant: Christ becomes the archetype who set forth a map for inner wholeness.

Ellen G. White’s doctrines, central to Seventh-day Adventist (SDA) theology and prominently featured in works like The Great Controversy, have faced substantial criticism from evangelical Christians, biblical scholars, and former Adventists. Critics argue that while White affirmed core Christian beliefs (e.g., salvation by grace through faith in Christ and the authority of Scripture), her writings introduce errors, inconsistencies, and extra-biblical requirements that distort the gospel. Here are the primary doctrinal issues raised:

My core argument rests on a teleological historical-linguistic theme: from Yeshua’s death and resurrection dated by most scholars to spring AD 30 (e.g., Nisan 14, Passover; see consensus in Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary studies and Edinburgh research)—until the onset of major Russia-Iran pressure on Israel around now, roughly two thousand years have elapsed.

The libation bowl, known in Greek as phiale (φιάλη), emerges in the archaeological recordaround 2500–2200 BC during the late Neolithic/early Bronze Age in the Aegean. The earliest examples—clay, stone, and occasionally metal—come from Minoan Crete and the Cyclades islands. These were shallow, wide-mouthed vessels, often featuring a central omphalos (a raised boss) for thumb-grip during pouring.

Ezekiel 38

1 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying, 2 Son of man, set thy face against Gog, the land of Magog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal, and prophesy against him, 3 And say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against thee, O Gog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal: 4 and I will turn thee back, and put hooks into thy jaws, and I will bring thee forth, and all thine army, horses and horsemen, all of them clothed with all sorts of armour, even a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords: 5 Persia, Ethiopia, and Libya with them; all of them with shield and helmet: 6 Gomer, and all his bands; the house of Togarmah of the north quarters, and all his bands: and many people with thee.

This will be our fourth Prophetic View lecture having left off with a brief stint of Ezekiel’s “Meshech” or “Meskhi” name. Both “Meshech” and “Tubal” are found in Ezekiel 38:2 as the province-cities by which their “Chief” (or “Rosh1”) prince2 named Gog to be found amongst the Colchian tribes of the Caucasus between the Euxine (Black) and Caspian Sea.

We left off last time with Ezekiel’s prophecy of Israel’s return as One Kingdom no longer being divided into two . In Ezekiel 37:26 an “everlasting” covenant will be made with God as the Tabernacle in the midst of His people for evermore.