Brandon Heinzelmann

by

The intricacies of God’s words are lost in the blunt English versions of the Bible. The English versions not only keep us in darkness from God’s words but keep us in cycles or ‘return to’ mental/ spiritual problems. I believe that a healthy study in the Greek New Testament frees us from these ‘cycles of return’ to emotional disasters. One such study of major import is found in the intricacies of the Greek New Testament that defend the honor of the Bible from the ‘iso-glossed’ and hand picked ‘damnation verses’ of the Scripture.

Let the case begin against the blunt English versions. Let the knowledge of linguistic and cultural-historical usages of the Greek illuminate the common usage of the Greek and how the Greek was properly applied to the Scripture that has now been perverted to damnation verses.

Lastly, did you know that Universal Salvation was believed based on the intellectual merits of the Greek New Testament’s agreement with early Systematic Theology in the Early Church up to ca. 500 A.D.!?!?

0:00
0:00
skip_previous
play_arrow
pause
skip_next
replay_10
volume_up
volume_down
volume_off
description
view_headline
Nothing found!
close
by

The intricacies of God’s words are lost in the blunt English versions of the Bible. The English versions not only keep us in darkness from God’s words but keep us in cycles or ‘return to’ mental/ spiritual problems. I believe that a healthy study in the Greek New Testament frees us from these ‘cycles of return’ to emotional disasters. One such study of major import is found in the intricacies of the Greek New Testament that defend the honor of the Bible from the ‘iso-glossed’ and hand picked ‘damnation verses’ of the Scripture.

Let the case begin against the blunt English versions. Let the knowledge of linguistic and cultural-historical usages of the Greek illuminate the common usage of the Greek and how the Greek was properly applied to the Scripture that has now been perverted to damnation verses.

Lastly, did you know that Universal Salvation was believed based on the intellectual merits of the Greek New Testament’s agreement with early Systematic Theology in the Early Church up to ca. 500 A.D.!?!?

0:00
0:00
skip_previous
play_arrow
pause
skip_next
replay_10
volume_up
volume_down
volume_off
description
view_headline
Nothing found!
close
by

SETS OF ‘MOTIONS’ / PLATO’S DIALOGUES TO BIBLICAL FULFILLMENT

Loeb Classics; Plato; Cratylus; pg 121; vs. 418

SET ONE OF ‘MOTIONS’

Dei’on – “obligation” (Root: ‘to go through’)

*de’o—-* (root of Dei’on) – “to bind” as a prisoner or animal—-Mt. 18:18

(Cf. “Deismos” as cognate)

Blaberon (cognate)

SET TWO OF ‘MOTIONS’

(Plato says that these particular names signify the principle of *arrangement* and *motion*

Owe-fee’-lee-mohn – “useful”

Lusitelon – “profitable”

Kerda.lay’on – “gainful”

Agathon – “good”

Ksoom-fe’ron – “advantageous”

Euphoron – “prosperous”

SET THREE OF MOTIONS

Zay.mee.OH’.dayce “that which binds motion” – in a good way (halting from trouble)

(Other spelling: daymiOH’dayce = good”)

SET FOUR OF MOTIONS

Hay.doe.nay (from, “hedonism”) – “pleasure”

Lupay – “pain”

Epithumea – “desire”

SET FOUR OF MOTIONS

Hay.doe.nay (from, “hedonism”) – “pleasure”

Lupay – “pain”

Epithumea – “desire”

SET FIVE OF MOTIONS

‘Haydonay’ – ‘the action that tends towards advantage 

(Root of haydonay: “eonay” – PN – TO BREATHE

LUPAY – “dissolution of the body which takes place through the process of pain”

Ania – “sorrow – that which hinders motion”

(Root to ‘ania’: “algaynos” – “distress” – “having a hard time”

SET SIX OF MOTIONS

Odu’nay – “grief; putting on the pain; 

Aksthaydon – “vexation” – as in weight 

Aksthos – “burden” – “as vexation of weight puts upon motion”

Loeb Classics; Plato; Cratylus; pg 125; 420, B, .5

SET SEVEN OF MOTIONS

Doxa  (“opinion” – i.e., ‘shooting for the goal or intention to meaning without knowledge or certainty as of yet’).

In Plato’s dialogue, Doxa comes from the pursuit {‘dioxis’} which the soul carries on as it pursues the knowledge of the nature of things, or, most likely, from the *SHOOTING OF THE BOW (toxon)*; i.e., though we can’t say for sure that we have hit the mark, we are aiming with good intention. 

Oi’.ay.sis – “belief” —- “the sense of the MOTION of the soul towards the essential nature of every individual thing (i.e., *trajectory*; *intention*; *goal towards someTHING; from the universal to the particulars {from the Heavenly to the Earthly—Kyle})

Just as “oi.ay.sis” acts in its motion, so does “Boulay”.

Boulay –  “intention” – denotes “shooting (Bolay)”

Boulesthai – “wish”

Bouleu’esthai – “plan” = denoting “aiming at something”

SET EIGHT OF MOTIONS

Kara – “joy”

Diakoosis – “of the flow of the soul”

Terpsis – “delight”

Terpnon – “creeping of the soul” – “delightful”

{page: 123; vs. 419}

(Root of “terpnon” – *-pnoay [pne-] = “breath”)

Eufrosu’ne – “mirth” = {“harmony with all things/ universe}

{eu – well; good + sunay – “all things ‘summed’/ ‘joined’ (together)”

EpithuMEE.ah – “desire”; thumos = thusis = “boiling over; boiling of”

*’Ee.oo.sa* = “goes into thumos” – cf. below with above

SET NINE OF MOTIONS

Hay’.me.roos – “longing”; “the day”; 

(Root: “hay’.mee” + “rous”

** Hay.mee.ros** = emera + roos = longing for the flow; the flow that goes away; takes away; the “rush away as a stream from the soul”; “yearning”

(Cf hay.meh.nos)

Pothos- “yearning”

“Allothi pou” – “that which is elsewhere”

“Hay.me.roos” “present (object)” – “The Day that Has Come Upon””

“Pothos” – “absent”

*Eros – “flows in from out” 

(Cf. Root Eros —> root: “esrei” = ‘eis’ = ‘into’ + “roos” = ‘river’ = ‘flows INTO as a river [ from an outside source]. 

SET TEN OF MOTIONS

Aboulia – “evil”; “without intention”, “ill-advised” (cf. to notes below)

(“A” = alpha privative = Greek prefix for making negative, negating the meaning)

So, Boulay + alpha privative = “Aboulay” – “evil”; “ill advised; without intention, plan, goal, desire, wish, trajectory; *therefore, a *failure to hit* = cf. “sin” = Greek: “harmateia” = sin, senex, sine, missing the mark (even if planned to hit the mark)

Anankay – (‘anagkay’ = ana’g {“g” takes the nasal/liquid-“n”}kay) – “compulsion”

Hekou’sion – “voluntary” —( Hekou’sion means ‘voluntary’ because ‘hekou’sion’ comes *in line* with the ‘events’ of motion to the *YIELDING* (Greek:eikon = English: ‘icon’) and not in opposition. 

Anankay is the converse of of “hekou’sion” and is ‘compulsory’ and ‘resistant’, which is contrary to the will and is associated with error and ignorance. Anankay is likened to *walking through ravines (‘ankay’ {cf. “angst”}), because they are hard to traverse, rough, and rugged, and *RITARD MOTION*. 

SET ELEVEN OF MOTIONS

CONVERSE OF NOBLEST AND THEIR HINDRANCE TERMS OF MOTION 

Aletheia (‘to wander with’ + ‘god (goddess)’ = “To wander with the God”); “Divine Motion”; Divine Motion of the Universe

Pseudos – “the opposite of Motion”; ‘held back and kept silent – hence, associated with ‘slumberers’ – heu’dousi {the addition of “ps” {or “psi”}, says Plato through Socrates’ daemon {deity mind}, simply conceals the ‘slumber’ word, “heu’dousi”.

Onoma – signifying “this is *a being about* which our search is”.

Summation

So, Aletheia means ‘motion forward’, Pseudos is known by being the opposite of “truth” or “aletheia” —-the slumber from Divine motion, and onoma

*signifies* what the divine wandering is about. 

This summation gives us hints to our New Testament Theology within the Greek. “Nomos” is the Name is “onoma” is “authority”. Jesus is the “Name” of God represented on earth. His “motion” was THE *Sign* or “Onoma” of God the Father’s Will or “boulay”. The Disciples *followed* or *wandered* with the Name of God, the Onoma of God-Father, aka, Jesus. Their ‘motion’ driven by the God on earth followed in line with the Narration of the Universal Divine Motion of doing and fulfillment. Pseudos, to my view, indicates the ‘hated’ mentioned in Romans 9. “Before they were born, God loved Jacob and hated Esau. The “slumber” is the meaning of Esau. As the Greek gives us “miseo” for “hate” in this passage of Romans 9, it does NOT say, “I, the Lord, despise you”, rather, it means “dismiss”, “not include for the narration of motion of Divine Wandering, hence, the Jews to Jesus to the Disciples to us. The “Sign (onoma)” of God is in US now. This does NOT mean that Esau, as the Middle Eastern race, shall be damned. Rather, for now, Islam is not the indicative “Onoma” of Grace, forgiveness, salvation through Jesus’ atoning blood. This is simply factual and not condescending. 

Calvert Watkins’, “How to kill a Dragon”, explains “hindrance (from the societal ideas of “stoppage”)” as stoppage of waterways to plenish their respective cultures.

by

YHVH – The Pre Biblical God of the Canaanites. The True Monotheistic God on Mount Seir – where the Nephilim were slayed.

0:00
0:00
skip_previous
play_arrow
pause
skip_next
replay_10
volume_up
volume_down
volume_off
description
view_headline
Nothing found!
close
by

Secular Angels were metallurgists; a look at the ancient Cauldron

0:00
0:00
skip_previous
play_arrow
pause
skip_next
replay_10
volume_up
volume_down
volume_off
description
view_headline
Nothing found!
close
by

Part one: Yahweh and His cult of Metallurgy.  The evidence of YHVH before the Bible

0:00
0:00
skip_previous
play_arrow
pause
skip_next
replay_10
volume_up
volume_down
volume_off
description
view_headline
Nothing found!
close
by

In this ‘end cap’ lecture I talk about *line versus circle* ideology/ theology. The pagan’s hope is in the attempt, through false hope, of obtaining fame and fortune, i.e., a “NAME” for themselves. The Anglo Saxon language gives us “LOF AND DOME (height and dominion)” <- the “pagan’s hope”.

Contrariwise, the Messianic Hope is Linear in its approach. It has a line with certain events on it that lead to a POINT. The first are natural and legal events that create the prototype, the next are symbolic/ allegorical-prophetic, the next is Historical-Fulfilment. All 3, I would argue more, must work together to complete the equation.

The pagan looks for hope in this world’s riches and is fooled by ‘almost obtaining’ *more*. The cycle, or ring, *tricks* the one who desires “LOF and DOME” – or, as Genesis 11 says, “Let us make us a NAME (Hebrew: SHEM = ‘boundary, authority, renown, law, hedge’) for ourselves lest we be scattered abroad”.

My Point:

The “obtainment” of Glory, Name, Lof and Dome has been acquired by Christ. We partake in HIS Resurrection, His Name, His Glory as His Children. When we try to “obtain” stuff and things and our glory, we turn everything into objects that are not obtainable, or, as Gollum would call it, my “Precious”. God knows how to *dispense* to us. This is the Faith God that requires us to have in order to have peace and understanding PAST this life of “attainments”.

The Devil, The Impeder, The Impediment, the Hoarder is a theme for all of the ancient world.

The old world had, as it still does today, two distinct approaches: either “My will be done” or “His Will be Done”. Your will is the Ring’s trickery and His Will is the infinite case for peace, —and NOT fretting what you don’t have or what others have.

We know who and where the Dragon is and lies. We know this because we are a witness to it in our own lives and the lives of others when we make obstacles out of people because they ‘are in our way’. We know where Christ is when we share mercy and Grace.

0:00
0:00
skip_previous
play_arrow
pause
skip_next
replay_10
volume_up
volume_down
volume_off
description
view_headline
Nothing found!
close
by

The Dragon {part 2}. A Biblical perspective. (dry reading from Strong’s and McClintock’s – but, lots of information with some interpolation of my studies).

0:00
0:00
skip_previous
play_arrow
pause
skip_next
replay_10
volume_up
volume_down
volume_off
description
view_headline
Nothing found!
close
by

“Biblical Parallels with Tolkien’s Works” —“The Dragon, The Ring and its symbology:  being Married to something means freedom from something else

0:00
0:00
skip_previous
play_arrow
pause
skip_next
replay_10
volume_up
volume_down
volume_off
description
view_headline
Nothing found!
close