witchcraft-spells

 Goetics in Macbeth and The Faerie Queene

Kyle Jones Book Review Synthesis:

Goetics in Macbeth and The Faerie Queene 

Goetics—from the Greek goēteia, meaning sorcery or deceptive magic—refers to low, coercive witchcraft involving spirit-summoning and illusion. In Renaissance literature, it contrasts with higher theurgia or natural magic. 

In Macbeth, goetics manifests in the Weird Sisters. Harold Bloom, in Macbeth: A Dagger of the Mind, describes Macbeth as uniquely “in touch with the night world of Hecate and the Weird Sisters.” He calls Macbeth “a weird, an involuntary soothsayer,” whose proleptic imagination already harbors the darkness the witches merely echo. The Arden Shakespeare editions footnote the sisters’ ambiguity—they blend Norn-like fate with vulgar witchery, their prophecies blurring external evil and internal ambition. Their cauldron scene and apparitions exemplify coercive, chthonic goetic ritual, driving Macbeth’s descent into tyranny. 

By contrast, C.S. Lewis in Poetry and Prose in the Sixteenth Century approaches goetics through Spenser’s Archimago, the arch-sorcerer of The Faerie Queene. Archimago practices exactly this deceptive, shape-shifting magic—summoning sprites to create false Una and Redcrosse’s dream-visions. Lewis sees it as part of Spenser’s moral allegory, where goetic illusion tests virtue but remains contained within Faerie Land’s ordered world. Unlike Macbeth’s irreversible plunge, Spenser’s goetics serves the poem’s psychotherapeutic harmony—evil magic is vivid yet ultimately subordinate to the quest for Holiness. 

The juxtaposition is stark. Macbeth’s goetics is tragic, psychological, and chaotic—Bloom’s “night world” consumes the hero. Spenser’s is allegorical, contained, and health-giving—Lewis’s “common wisdom” through images. One destroys; the other instructs. 

More Articles

Tempo is Tempter

THE THING THAT HAS BEEN IS THAT THING WHICH SHALL BE; AND THAT WHICH IS DONE IS THAT WHICH SHALL BE DONE; —THEREFORE, THERE IS NO NEW THING UNDER THE SUN. Ecclesiastes 1:9

Read More »

Eternity

Two Greek adjectives, both often rendered “eternal, ” actually differ sharply: aïdios means strictly endless or timeless; aiônios—from aiôn, “age” or “epoch” —means pertaining to an age, long-lasting, or belonging to the world to come. Scripture and most early Fathers reserve aïdios for divine life and bliss, never for punishment or fire. That lexical choice is deliberate and carries massive theological weight.

Read More »

Only Purity can make the Reality of Fantasy

There is no doubt in my mind that Tolkien felt the bankruptcy for the meaning of words in his time. Tolkien knew that words and WORD (the substantive reference by which all things refer to for meaning), via “Narration”/ “Story”, were the cure for giving those who cared about meaning a hope. Such a hope was the consistency of ‘signals’ and ‘semiotics’.

Read More »

There is No Pre-Tribulation Rapture Part 1

The pre-tribulation rapture isn’t mentioned anywhere. The term itself is absent from Scripture. George Eldon Ladd argued in The Blessed Hope that the New Testament presents one unified hope—the visible parousia of Christ, not a secret escape.

Read More »