Day: September 18, 2021

Consistency of Motion – Part 2 Amended

Restating part one, addendums, extra mentions and exonerations
Technically, the term,‘belief’, never meant to act in “blindness” until our recent perversion of this term—that is, the ‘moralization’ of this term.  Initially, the term, “belief”, would have carried an observed intentional and honest act. 

Plato’s daemon, Socrates says: “Doxa (glory) is derived either from the pursuit (dioxis) which the soul carries on as it pursues the knowledge of the nature of things, or from the shooting of the bow (toxou boulay); the latter is more likely; at any rate, oi’eisis (*belief*) supports this view, for it appears to mean the motion (oisis) of the soul towards the essential nature of every individual thing, just as boulay (intention) denotes shooting (boulay) and boulesthai (intended trajectiory/ intention/ wish/ desire), as well as bouleusthai (plan), denotes aiming at something. All these words seem to follow ‘doxa’ and to express the idea of shooting, just as “a’boulia (a = negative prefix-‘alpha privative’ = “not” + boulia = council, direction, advisement), on the other hand, appears to a *failure to hit*, as if a person did not shoot or hit that which he shot at or wished or planned or desired”.

I also condemn (Latin: damnus -‘critique’’ {not send to hell}) the scientific community when they condemn the ‘believing’ communities for employing ‘faith’ or ‘belief’. Such ‘science’ such be criticized for not doing their research into their word usage. No word, no act, no energy comes out of a vacuum. There’s always a ‘string’ attached; you Quantum P-braners know what I’m talking about!
Origin of “belief (noun)” and “faith (verb)”
“Bheidh” is the Proto Indo European/ Kurgan root for “belief”. “Bheidh” carries a collage of meaning. It carries with it the meaning of “abode” or “abide”. As the Holy Spirit ‘abides’ in us; as the Holy Spirit makes His “abode” in us. It is a place of resting, trusting, etc.  King David “trusted” that he could kill the Giant. Not because he “saw” it but because he had been protecting sheep since his youth with his slingshot. David had “FAITH” in his past *accounts*. David had taken a ‘marking’ or ‘talley’ of his kills of predator animals that had the nature to kill his gentle sheep. This *kind* of faith is not to be moralized.

Such a “Faith” as David’s has been perverted by false moralists to say, “David’sthe type of faith was ‘blind’ “. It was not. Moreover, let’s turn it around: today’s moralist could use the ‘modern’ sense of ‘faith’ to say, “one must *act* in blind trust and go forth. This is unsound doctrinally and clashes with David (who was the ultimate example of “Trusting” in God as a mere human), any military action past or present, science, music, art…etc.

Another shade of error:  to act “blind” is separate from acting on the “unseen” from which we know makes sense in the Gestalt fashion. Much like the Holy Spirit is always with us but makes sense to us in the here and now. Yet, while Jesus was only here for a period of time in the flesh, His *Acts* were quantum in their meaning. HE fulfilled the Father’s written book about HIM before HE walked the earth. Therefore, each act fulfilled the next as a tightly woven poem. And, it is only through the Spirit can we “See” this Logos walked the Father’s preordained pathway.

Both the Holy Spirit and Jesus are “blind” to us now, because we don’t physically see them, but their substantial natures solidified one another in our worldviews if we are calibrated to look through these lenses. In this kind of Trust, faith, belief, Jesus, the Father, and Holy Spirit are not ‘blind things’ to us.
Many modern “christianities” have made “Faith” a ‘blind thing’ partly because it is much easier to control the ‘flock’. When there is a *command* to act on the illogical, then, power is given to the leaders. “Faith” became an implemented word for those ministers who would abuse their sheep. Never before have we seen this word, “Faith”, be so abused!  Yet it is greed, power, herding of the masses, etc. by ministers that have allowed it to be so mistranslated. Distilled down to it’s primal meaning: keeping the sheep blind equals money and power.

In the face of so many ministers is the knowledge of the original Greek and Hebrew Bible given, yet, they do nothing to aid the knowledge of this or many other terms. The ministers do not encourage the ‘flock’ to study, to know, to exegete, to exhaust the Scripture. There would be questions then! There would be a need for a Teacher of the Word who could answer and keep in check Biblical error! For God’s sakes, I need it!  There would be a counter balance to power given to the minister.
Sadly, I have been told from the highest level of my former “church” this past couple of years that I was weird for wanting to know the Greek and Hebrew. That I was ‘different’. They told me, “the study of Greek and Hebrew is ‘crazy, too much, too intense, etc.”. From this mindset, and the courses of actions, sociologically, I’m gone from this club. It took my wife, in different ways, to see the selfish side of this minister. As Covid hit in full force during December of 2020, this minister continued to push for *THE FAITHFUL* to ‘fill the pews’. That the “FAITHFUL” would not be deterred. All while, we encountered deaths by COVID in our “church”.  One way or the other, “FAITH”, “Belief”, “Trust”, etc. has been perverted by this man. He is only one of the other high percentages of ministers who do the exact same thing!

Consistency of Motion – Part 1 Amended

As a preface:

I never make a moral judgement in my writings. All terms used such as ‘pagan’, ‘heathen’ ‘non-christian’ are all in their respective usages. Pagan means ‘the other *page* or ‘those who camp on the outskirts of the *peg* or *pegged-off* area. “Heathen” means, ‘those who live on the uncultivated plains; ‘the heath’. Villains were villagers that shared the land of the King or Dominion. Non-christian simply means that. Agnostic simply means ‘not to claim to know’. Truth means “root, stem and branches”. I take ALL terms to their technical ranks, careful not to *moralize* them. All such words are researched by me through countless hours in Proto Indo European linguistics, Sumerian, Kartvelian, Syunik, etc. etc. In this approach we can come to clean truths as we will learn to believe, to trust, and to have faith in the natural flow of etymology and its WILL to express1 itself. The Logos will be born out of every natural condition given its time (xairos = “at the hand”/ “at the pointed to time”).

Many profess we’re in a “postmodern” or “post-truth” era. Simply put, this would mean that we are a culture without regard to ‘belief’ in truths , only ‘results’. The false assumption is this is a ‘christianized’ thing, therefore, a dulling of the senses for the ‘functional modern human’. Yet, the contradiction of judgments from the non-Christian arises when a belief in results is garnered.

This is exactly what the non Christian judges the Christian for being erroneous of. That is, both Christian and Non Christian employ a kind of faith. Simply put: ‘faith’ is something to ‘expect’ or ‘look out’ for. Faith is ‘substantial’, that is, Faith has *sub-standing* or an ‘under-root’ by which one can stand for, on, by, with. Hence, the Biblical formula: “Faith is the substance ‘upostasis [HUPO- under/ STASIS -standing] of things hoped for” (Hebrews 11:1).

1 Express: Latin: ex – ‘out’ + p.i.e. – ‘per-‘ = “to strike” {to push out}
2 Truth: P.I.E., “Daro” = (zero grade) “DR- = ‘truth’ = ‘tree’ = ‘root, stem and branches’. Cf. Tom Shippey’s, “roots, stems and branches”.

Sounds a little complicated? The second I said, “belief”3 Did I err? I did not, technically. Technically, ‘belief’ has never meant a practice in ignorance or a “blind” act. It’s something with ‘eyes wide open’ —-that is, something of expectation and its act of sober participation. “Belief”, true belief, employs a kind of ‘reason’. A reason by which ‘a particular logic’ is implemented and a Segway of events anticipated. I might say, the anatomy of the Logos acts out the Boule or Will of the Father. In these agreements of motion, so does nature follow in the same motion. There is nothing that disagrees with nature, the child of Boule.

Looking to the root meaning of “belief” we must turn to our mother languages to find the most ‘natural’ sense behind the abstracted word, “belief”. “Bheidh” is the Proto Indo European root for “belief”. “Bheidh” means a place from which something is awaited, a ‘place where consciousness operates – mentally, spiritually, physically.

“Faith” has been perverted by false moralists. “Faith” became a ‘blind thing’. “Faith” became an operative word implemented by ‘easy-believism’/ ‘theologians’ who would benefit from the sheep who continue to engage in ‘contract Christianity’. That is, ministers who would abuse their sheep by keeping them thinking that ritual without thought is salvific.

Never before have we seen this word, “Faith”, so abused, hence, the Church abused. Yet, greed, power, herding of the masses, etc. by ministers have allowed its mistranslation with all the Greek and Hebrew texts at their fingertips.

3 Proto – Indo – European root: “Bheidh” a resting place; awaiting place; abode; expect. One of the oldest senses to “bheidh” is found in the Albanian *bese* by which a family of a murdered member holds back their blood feud with the family of the murderer. The Albanian Bese or its P.I.E. zero grade equivalent, “bheidh” (bheidh-tya) is a *social contract* word for ‘a stay’ of action, ‘a halt’, ‘an observation of a law which halts retributive action’. Cf. Calvert Watkins, “The American Heritage dictionary of Indo European Roots” (pgs. 8-9). Joseph Shipley, “The Origins of English Words“ – Bheidh = “abide; abode” (pgs. 31-32).

Such a bankless meaning holds bankless doctrines. Such an abuse of power necessitates ‘shadow words’, ‘shadow logic’, ‘shadow theologies’.

Proving “Bheidh” (Faith) as substantial

The ‘flow’ of poetry, archery, meaning, music, etc. is called “rous” in Classical Greek.
We see ‘rous’ mentioned in Plato’s Cratylus as in the archer’s alignment with pure mathematics (or ‘boule’ – “the god’s council/ *volition*/ *volley*/ballistics) as we have and will state in this book. That is, the human’s ‘climb’ to the point of perfect reference or the god’s council, a.k.a., ‘The Will (boule)’.

It is the authority of the Boule of God that we *act*. The Boule is the council by which nature acts and we observe its non contradictory nature. This pagan Greek idea conjoins without turbulence to a confluence to Old and New Testament Theology. Though, the Greek language and myths are caught and echoed through Paul’s knowledge of Greek and European culture. The invisible stuff by which perfection is exuded or ‘shot’ from is God’s nature (cf. C.S. Lewis’ “A Study of Words” {chapter on: natura/ Phusis, kind}). It is this ‘stuff’, this “boule”, this “determinate council”, this “Will” that is imbued upon us to act in His likeness more and more as the imperfect verb of this action rushes to it’s ‘teleos’ or telegraphed designation. How could we perpetually resist that kind of Will? —-even Nature agrees with It, though not willingly in its futility, rather, it (nature) waits on God to free it from its directed course to destruction. It knows freedom is coming, it knows it can only choose destruction. Therefore, God created, chose and ordained this drama of trajectories for the tragic in order for Hope to come through. Romans 8:19.

In Plato’s “Cratylus”, the ‘Boule’ was what was NOT interrupted, whether in the action of an athlete or the verbal usage found in a Logical Dialogue. Likewise, the “LOGOS”, was Jesus’ other referential NAME. The human side, ‘the rous’ was coming to be as interwoven with LOGOS’. That is, the LOGOS became the Will in objective form and action. Here, we have total agreement of Verb of completion and the acts of perfection and in continuum.

This contextual flow of naturalism and the correlative word banks used to exemplify their natural contexts did commit the natural man (the uninterrupted a-moral pagan) to be driven to perfection with the god’s council on pagan (a-moral/natural) terms. How much more is this a notion to the God of the Universe in Christian verbiage?! One should see that these beautiful pagan word sources were undisturbed in their naturally used cultural flow. Furthered, these undisturbed rivers of meaning came to a completion and exemplification within our relationship between us Jesus Christ. This would indicate that the Pagan’s Saviour was Jesus in masks. I would make the argument that word exemplification met its apogee at the end of the second century A.D. when the early church thinkers dissolved and a politically charged ‘church’ took over, namely the post-nicene church (ca. 350 A.D. the christian thinkers lost their momentum due to Romanism infused ideas/Mariology/ worshipping of the saints, etc.{all of which I call true immoral paganism}).

It is within the diagrams of natural paganism (opposed to contrived immoral paganism) that I do find honesty within the movement or motion of the verbs of both Plato’s dialogues and the New Testament Text. The Anatomy of these verbs which carry the nominative signs like the plastikos (feathers, tassels, ornamentations attached to the clothing of the dancers to ‘show’ the movement of the deity) of the Elysian dances, does haunt me to the point where I am convicted by the Holy Spirit to feel God over my shoulder. One might think about this ‘kind’ of FAITH…..a substantial, tangible, non-blind FAITH (Bheidh); a FAITH that is a denial of the ‘blind faith’ that is concocted from this horrid Western Hemisphere of pseudo christian thought.

Furthered for all, this linguistic-math is found in the word for, “disciple”—“mathetikon”, or, “mathematician” of the WORDS of Christ. Such a mathetike fulfills their meaning in martyrdom or ‘maturity’ ..hence, ‘maturos’ in Greek.

Spiritual Covid “Omega Variant”

TRUTH and FALSEHOOD

Socrates says, “Truth” is the word, ‘aletheia’, by which we get the definition ‘to wander with the goddess’ without interruption (without halting, stepping around, stepping over, impeded ) of the goddess’ motion upon you’. Therefore, *divine wandering* = godly motion without impedance/ resistance. In contrast, ‘falsehood’ implies ‘holding back by force’ and contrasts itself with Truth. Falsehood is reckoned with ‘slumber’, ‘conceal’, ‘hide’ “. Plato; Cratylus 420: E

I take Plato’s words and hold them to the seat of the minister. Not the minister, the seat. If the minister’s words do not hold to the title/ position of the seat, please step down. Every word must be tested in the mouths of the ministers to the Scripture from which they are upheld, adored, supported, etc. Pivotal verses, passages, exegeses, etc. are foundational for the Christian Faith. Right? Or is your Bible nothing more than just a ‘good reference’ for ‘good sayings’? I could totally understand this approach and on ONE level, go with that….on the next level: apologetics, hermeneutics, eschatology and exegesis, etc….absolutely not. It is NOT *just* a Book. 

Droves come each week to not be fooled or lied to, right? Would droves come to the church to ‘feel good’ about a “I did my obligation” and “I checked in” and “I served my contract Christianity for the week” if they were conscious about their ***belief***?! Please say you don’t. 

Would you choose to get in your hot car, fight the kids, fight the everything for an hour and a half to get to a place for an hour and a 20 minutes that is not accurate in what they say? —-worse yet, have an agenda that takes precedent over the ‘acclaimed precedent source, the Bible. 

Hold your flappy leather bound Bible in the King James, which obviously Jesus and Paul spoke in…, nay, the Esv, Niv, Asb, “I do not care version”., etc. and you’re still wrong when you do not hold to the contingency that your text is inerrant. 

If I read Mark Twain’s, “Huckleberry Finn”, I would hold that it is ‘inerrant’ to Mark Twain and the ‘narrative’ by which it holds. If I teach a class on Huckleberry Finn, I will not OMIT a sentence like it’s NOT THERE. Let alone a chapter. Continuity, contiguity, inerrancy to its OWN NARRATION. Further yet, quit my class on Mark Twain’s, Huck Finn if I tell you that Samuel Clemons was really trying out his double entendres concerning horse sales at Dicky’s. If I create the aporia by intended omission I should be fired as a teacher of Mark Twain’s, Huck Finn. 

 When one claims that the Bible is wholly inspired please act upon it. Even if it were a lie (which I don’t), at LEAST ACT ON IT if you hold the ‘seat’ of the minister which claims its inerrancy!

If a minister claims that there is a particular book that is the “Greatest book in all of the Bible”—-I’m now interested. If a minister claims that “THAT particular book and chapter are the ‘greatest’ “ in the Bible…well, you MUST have something to show me, right? Well, if there is an omission of a verse that is FOUNDATIONAL to that particular chapter and book ( since, all must be truthful) and you, the minister, have CLEARLY omitted it for the sake of a particular narrative germaine to that ‘divided’ sect of religious “beliefs”, —then I am forever nauseated with this. 

So, there’s an argument against me here: “Kyle, they’re probably going to come back to that particular *key passage verse* to suture it all up”. The problem with that is, the omission of that *key passage verse* was necessary to promulgate dualism and its corrupted form of ‘free’ and ‘will’. As only Baptists can say, “yes, you are saved by *The Grace (unmerited favor/ unearned favor) of God* before the Foundation of the World and there’s nothing that can snatch you out of God’s hands (now, in the same breath they say (“they” = Charles Stanley, Adrian Rogers, every Southern Baptist out there) ..*BUT*, you can ‘reject’ Him and go to Hell”! Lol, sigh!….I say: “isn’t your ‘rejection’ also a part of the corruption of this world that is the ‘something’ that is the ‘nothing’ in the * nothing can snatch you out of God’s hands? NO THING can snatch you….not a loop hole BASED ON THE CORRUPTED IDEA THAT FREE WILL IS RENEGADE WILL. “Free Will” has a better translation that I will give you: “You are freely bound to act within the limitations that make the bullseye. If you are bound to missing the bullseye you are ‘free from the bullseye and limited to the miss….a VERY BROAD and OPEN *FREEDOM* ”. 

“Free Will”, in the sense that you regenerate and fall constantly, which you know you do in at least your thoughts, is a ‘nonce’ thing. There is no substance nor actuality in that. If you regenerate from a body that naturally inclined the death (spiritual) then, what ‘goodness’ was in you?…God, or You? Romans 3: 1-ff….”There is no one who is righteous, ALL go their own way, there is NONE who do good”. I ask again, “Where does the Goodness come from?” Maybe more importantly, “WHO sustains the GOODNESS that up until NOW we are kept from ourselves?” 

My book covers that “belief” (“ousis” {Greek}) is actually based on those things that you can perceive as reasonable, good, salvific, contiguous with the motion of God upon you…that thing that you look out to …expect… 

If you believe in dualism —-I have no problem with you. I will give you love, grace, charity like God and kind people give me, freely. I am a positivist in this regard. Be a dualist and may God bless us all anyway. My issue is the foundation by which the contiguity of the Biblical text of Romans chapters 8 and 9 are held together by each chapter’s verbiage. 

Back to my emotion on this: I get it, I let it go, I do not judge, but I never forget. 

Dualism is the narration that we have defaulted to in Christendom. Its origins began in Persia with one of the longest practiced religions in the world, Zoroastrianism. It definitely influenced Sedond Temple Judaism, Gnosticism, Greek Philosophy, Islam and factions of Christianity (more than ever at present). Dualism is a replacement theology for the belief of Sovereignty that says, “God is Sovereign and He chooses and wills all things——not you. 

Dualism says, “God versus Satan”—- JUST like Superman versus any arch villain. *Who will win?!* Gosh! I don’t know!?! Maybe God just couldn’t save some of those poor slobs from themselves while He saved others that were BIGGER WORSE SLOBS than the ‘’’’unsaved””—— a term of TOTAL HUMANISTIC JUDGEMENT. 

At what point do we stop judging? Ephesians 2 makes it clear that we were at one time ALL a bunch of wretches—-unworthy, unregenerate. Then, Who *regenerates*? Does a dead person make a living decision?!

Dualism creates fear that ‘you better do a good work and not *let the devil get you* or you’re going to hell. Sovereignty and Grace say that you are ultimately missing the mark by your ego centric nature and inclination and that God is growing in you to become, to evolve to that more perfect being just as He is. Isn’t this ‘evolution’? Going to that more perfect place? Going against ‘a nature’ that the athlete fights daily to overcome? What a relationship in that God would predestinate {pre – horizon}, not just ‘foreknow’ {pro-ginosko}, me before the foundation of time and space to be His (Romans 8:29). Either God is Sovereign without constraint Who has PERFECT WILL and IMPLEMENTATION or not. And, NEVER buy into the Baptist argument that “God only *foreknew* …not “determined”—-again, read, Romans 8:29 “For whom God did foreknow He also did predestinate to become in the image of His Son”. 

There are 66 terms for “WILL” and 15 for “Free” that I have in my book. Which ‘cocktail’ combination of “Free Will” will this argument go to? ….sigh…. I want to speak my heart.. I don’t mean to offend…I mean to ‘save’…that is, save us all from CONFUSION…especially, myself. Forgive me if I have offended you but I can’t relent. 

It was Romans 8:29 that was *omitted* last Sunday. A full reading of Romans all the way up to that ONE VERSE…Why couldn’t that have been read?…

I got this out. Many talk about your day, your dog, cats, wars, Covid, abuse, the horrors, the pleasures of life, music, etc…. I took this time to say this because I am a real human being that feels this way right now. Your cat will not offend me, neither will your new house boat, will this offend you? 

If I’m in error, forgive me… I’m a work in progress. Please forgive the grammar and spelling…all the errors. I typed with emotion and left my grammar skills on the shelf. 

Here ( just now) is the response of an Elder in the Church to me after I addressed this issue: “to Kyle: