“The Supernatural-All-Too-Natural-History of God’s Name” Part One

The all too natural ancient etymologies of God’s “epithets”

Gud God, Holy Cow, What kind of Heavenly Cheese?

3 Main Epithets:

Epithet 1 (“God”)

One of the earliest sentient cultures of great intelligence was (and STILL IS!) the Kartuli culture. This Kartuli or Kartvelian  culture gave the Sumerians a relationship between nature and the heavens. Kartvelian culture made the Sumerian Language, culture and practices *sacrosanct*. Sumerians, seemingly,  were primarily nothing more than an agrarian culture.

One can see the ‘imprint’ from the Kartvelian’s language to the Sumerians when one looks at the etymological origins of Sumerian inherited words by which are seen in later Sumerian agricultural, religious, political-organizing a city-state, etc. 

By the way, Kartvelian culture did indeed affect the entire Indo European, Indo Germanic, Semitic, world, as well as Germanic, Norse, Anglo Saxon, and Icelandic Literature.

Such a particular example can be seen as follows in the dynamic between the Kartuli/ Kartvelian culture, Sumerian agrarian to city-state and Akkadian-Semetic

With the etymological observance of Kartvelian being a Caucasus parent language of Sumerian synthetic-aspect language, we see the occurrence of a few things.

The simple bucolic (Greek: boukolos = “herdsmen”, from “bous” = “ox”) Sumerian word for bull, ox, cow, etc. is, “Gud, Gur, and gu4”. 

With the influence of the already Divinely appointed sense to “guda” from the Kartvelian culture ca. 3,000 B.C., Sumeria was given an astronomical and astrological sense to its agricultural practices. The Kartvelian brings us the heavenly word, “guda”, =  (gud, gur, gu – the divine bull, sun and moon. steer, bullock, ox, “that which pulls the plow”),

We see the same in the Akkadian (MUL (of the heaven) GU (cow/ ox) AN NA (Heaven)= “the Bull of heaven”—therefore, “that which brings/ treads the Day”). 

Other epithets that can be seen as the same function:

UTU in Sumerian or SHAMASH (son of Sin)  in Akkadian were Mesopotamian deities that were seen as part of a Trinitarian idea.  These two, UTU and SHAMASH, were seen with the Moon god, Sin (in Akkadian {Sumerian: Nanna}), and the goddess, Ishtar (in Akkadian {Sumerian: Inanna}) which is also the equivalent to the Roman Venus or Greek Madonna.  

Thanks to the Kartvelian world, we see many world  “Bull” myths that led to the first senses of “baptism” that might be related to the “christian baptisms” of today. Walter Dale did a wonderful treatment of the 6 main forms of ‘baptisms’ that the Bible refers to (plus the extra pagan rite baptism of the Bull’s blood which I believe is syncretic practice between ancient paganism and Israelite cultic practice). Such ‘baptisms’ mentioned in his 4 volume treatment on “Baptisms” start with the ‘pagan-rite-taurobouleum’ or ‘bull’s-blood baptism”.

After Kartvelian influence, many Sumerians observed the horns, the moon, the maiden, the god UTU, etc. as collective symbols by which their culture’s “sense” of well being between farming, God, sex, procreation, birthing, neighbors, etc. began.   

We also see how this very early observance did spread to much of the Asian, Mediterranean and Occidental world. Such divine observance of was seen/ still seen in Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism, Egypt, Greece, Israel, Rome and Germany.  

In the ancient rituals of the Kartvels (or ancient Georgians), the “guda” was observed as the divine Bull, Sun and Moon from which we see that the Sumerians associated all 3 together in their ancient religious observances.

The word, “Quat “, or “Kwat “ is an early Proto-Indo-European word. Its origin shows us the word, “Cheese—the curdled milk of the cow”.  This, in turn, became a morphological division word for the interrogative, “What is this?—-hence, “WHAT?” The skin sack of the bull represents the “DIVINE BULL” coming from HEAVEN and descending into the Skin Carcass or sack. Such an incarnation is very well seen in our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ,  in one sense: Christ is God. Christ came into the ‘form of a man’ to endure as man and God. Jesus Christ is God wearing a human skin sack, to say equivocally to the Kartvelian idea of Guda. So, the words, “what?, cheese, bull, sack for libations which were formed from the skin or carcass of the cow, and God” did originate from the all too natural and mundane terms that were seen everyday. 

From now on, you might think of the “heavenly cheese” of the Dutch (“kaas”), or, “Gouda” and all its cognates mentioned here and way beyond, when gormandizing on such a delight! Oh, yeah, did I tell you that the “Kaas” was “Das Got “….Old German, Got = “The Good’ = “ The God”. 

—————————————————————————————————

Epithet 2 – “The Word”

The LOGOS and his base beginnings.

P.I.E. (Proto-Indo-European) = “lg- as a “classifier” or “organizer” of firebrands or logs. 

P.I.E. – *LG*= ‘the logs that were *collected* (Grimm’s law: labial/gutteral) and categorized in orders of sizes and types to burn, build, etc.  The smaller logs were used, obviously, to start the fire while the larger logs were placed later for the greater heat. 

The strongest logs were used for possible tools, wheels, carts, weapons, house building material, etc.  

We get our suffix, -ology, as to mean, “classification, category of, study of, words of “.  

Hence, *leg*, *lg*,  (Greek:‘logos’) = “the classification and categorization of things”.

It is not a wonder that Plato looked to the “Driving Force” of the universe as “Logos”.  Plato expounded on Logos as a part of a Divine Trinity consisting of ‘good’, ‘logos’, and ‘world spirit’.  Logos’ attributes, as seen by Plato, were the aspect of Wisdom, Reason, etc..  It is interesting that the very archaic, “LG”, meaning categorizer, organizer, Collocator, etc,….collectively, meant, “Judge”.

The development of “LOGOS” finally came to its fruition in the Johannine Gospel (Gospel of John) as “…and the LOGOS ***became flesh*** “.  

What an astounding sense to the first century Chrestoi who understand the Greek classics, the Ne’evim ( the prophets ) and Messianism as ‘the Fulfillment of the World’s Pain and Cure!!!

————————————————————————————————

Epithet 3 “EL and YAH”

Egyptian and Babylonian scriveners, bards, poets, prophets, historians, and Astrologers all looked to the bull as the strong one.  The Bull, Apis (Egyptian), or the Sinaitic Hebrew pictograph: Aleph* (The bull is the ‘first’, ‘the lead’-hence, the “Aleph”, or “ALPHA”, hence, the first letter in the Hebrew Alphabet {aleph – beyt/ alpha (in Greek) and, the letter “a” in English}).

“AL”, “The “Heavenly-Bull”, or, “UTU”, represents the divine treader or maker of the traces by which the Lead Bull has established. The Taurus, or Bull) , which was and is the vowel carrier for the “A” sound and means, “Bull; Ox”. “AL or EL (Hebrew)” became known as “the God” of the Hebrews. “Elohim” was the ‘congress’ or ‘hierarchs’ of “EL” that did the bidding, expressed the notion, etc. of EL. 

The Hebrew took the AL Verb to the morphological EYEH. Eyeh carried the “prosthetic E” or removable “E” (in this case, the prefix) which led to “Yah”, which, in turn, became the hypocoristicon of the more elaborate, “Yehoua”, (YHVH). Once again, the VERB, Yah, denoted “THE ALL POWERFUL ONE”. Yah, in its most simple definition means = “makes to exist”. Yahweh = Yahoua comes from the Mesopotamian relation of man to God and God to man meaning: “Friend of Man”.  “Creator of Man” and, “the God who Warned man before Flood”.  This same YHVH God talked and walked with mankind millenia before Moses!

The Misunderstood Meanings of Happy & Sad

Happy and Sad/ Kob and Satis

2 Terms to know:

1) *Happy*: Proto Indo European: “Kob” = ‘met to the desire of one’s wants to make *happy*’; ‘to suit, fit, succeed’; Old Norse: ‘chance, good luck (allotment)’/ Middle English: ‘chance, fortune’

2) *Sad*: Old English: “saed” = ‘sated’, full, having had one’s fill (of food, fighting, sex, etc.)’; {rooted the same throughout all Germanic etymologies the same as the Old English and Latin} Latin/ Indo European roots: “Satis” = ‘fully satisfied, satiated and sad’.

We culturally believe that “happy” conveys the opposite meaning of “sad” but this is not true. Happy and sad need each other to make ‘secular sense’,‘natural sense’ or “cause and effect” (cf. to footnote 1)

The ‘probability picture (cf. to  footnote 2)‘ goes as follows: “the effect was the ‘satis’.  John’s death was from the complications of a heart attack. The part about ‘John incessantly eating horrible foods and never exercising’ was the “kob” of John. The fulfillment of overeating was the “satis” of John. 

So, in John’s case, Kob, a.k.a., ‘gormandizing’ or ‘gluttony’, telegraphed to Kob’s “SATIS”, i.e., death

As a drug addict is ‘happy’ to get their fix, the telegraph of happy is being sad, depressed, lost, dead, hence, “satis”. Happy to Sad.

The problem all along has been that the individual was ‘dispensing allotments’ to themselves. They ‘allotted’ their ‘apportionments’ to make them ‘happy’ versus ‘met’.

Happy and Sad

METOD or MEASURER (cf. to footnote 3) or Deity that “knows” how to dispense. This is the interconnected genius of linguistics that brings us back in time to the God to history to language relation. God, the Measurer, can ‘Kob’ us, that is, Metod can ‘fully meet us to all of our wants and needs without our hurt. When we find our end result of gormandizing on HIS word, we are never left hurt. We are infinite beings with infinite capacity for an infinite GOD. THIS relationship of cause and effect is the ONLY relationship that no one can ever go ‘overboard’ (cf. to footnote 4).

Footnotes

1 Uninterrupted flow. Plato gives us the term, “poesis” to mean ‘a flow that moves without disturbance’.

2 I.e., ‘what is provable within the *picture frame* of observable or ostensible judgement.

3 Therefore, the cause is kob. The effect is satis. They cannot be disenfranchised from one another unless they are plasticized as terms used for unnatural agendas#. I’d like to say that not always is Kob to Satis a bad thing when taken to the Metaphysical. It can be the best thing when taken to the METOD or MEASURER or Deity that “knows” how to dispense. This is the interconnected genius of linguistics that brings us back in time to the God to history to language relation. God, the Measurer, can ‘Kob’ us, that is, Metod can ‘fully meet us to all of our wants and needs without our hurt. When we find our end result of gormandizing on HIS word, we are never left hurt. We are infinite beings with infinite capacity for an infinite GOD. THIS relationship of cause and effect is the ONLY relationship that no one can ever go ‘overboard’.

The Allotment God#

4 It is only in the Theological sense do we find the ultimate maxim for this lesson:

If we do not count on God as the Sovereign Giver (giver of satisfaction and joy) we replace HIM with dispensing gods# that ‘allot’ —or “luck” to us, our fated ‘apportionments’. For as Ecclesiastes teaches us in chapters one and two, *”We are never satisfied by the objective things in this world; all that is in the world, when objectified and sought after, becomes vainglory, and associated with sadness if not used in relation to God’s Sovereignty, that is, His dispensing”*.